mortgage loan auditmortgage fraud audit my mortgagetruth in lending violationsforensic mortgage document loan audit reviewLoan Auditing CompanyStop ForeclosureBest Mortgage Auditsusing a forensic audit in court
forensic loan auditing service
Forensic Loan Audit
forensic audit used in court
respa violations
stopping foreclosure
loan modification attorneys
avoiding bankruptcy
audit my mortgage
loan audits
truth in lending violations
mortgage auditors
Testimonials - Forensic Auditing Company
Loan Auditing Software - Loan Auditing Software is DANGEROUS and MISLEADING!
Training and Support - Become more knowledgable about violations and foreclosure defense
CLE Calandar  - Attorney CLE classes on Foreclosure Defense and Understanding Violations
CPE Calandar - C.P.A. and Accountant CPE Credit Courses
Case Management Software and Solutions - Streamline your case management
Document Management and Storage - File Retention, Storage, Conversion, and Real Time Access
Learn Tactics and Strategies of Borrower Mitigation - Visit USLA's Loan Settlement and Foreclosure Defense Blog
foreclosure attorneys for loan modification

audit attorneys http://www.loansettlementusa.com/
structured settlement expert witness for mortgage litigation
expert testimony foreclosure case law respa statutes truth in lending laws motion to dismiss holder in due course forensic audit used in court truth in lending statutes respa laws motion for summary judgement lost note affidavit formal complaint sample respa demand letter

mortgage fraud

mortgage violations

mortgage auditing

mortgage modification

modify my mortgage

find fraud in my mortgage

audit my mortgage

mortgage document review

truth in lending

predatory

forensic loan auditor

auditing my loan

Forensic loan analysis

loan audit

Forensic loan audit

forensic loan audit

lender audit

motion to dismiss

tro temporary restraining order

motion for injunctive relief

mortgage securitization

lost note affidavit

sample respa demand letter

sample respa non-compliance letter

formal complaint

Audit my servicer

Respa violations

loan modification

loan modification review

get a loan modification

tila violations

stopping foreclosure

stop foreclosure

foreclosure attorneys in florida

florida bankruptcy law

forensic audit software

florida foreclosure law

predatory lending

predatory loan

forensic loan software

Forensic Loan Auditing Company

mortgage fraud investigators

mortgagefraudexaminers

mortgage audit companies

attorney for loan modification in california

structured settlement

expert witness for mortgage litigation

expert testimony

holder in due course

forensic audit used in court

foreclosure case law

truth in lending laws

truth in lending statutes

respa laws

respa statutes

motion for summary judgement

cle credits

cle credits on real estate law

cle credits for mortgage law

common law torte used in foreclosure defense

Loan modification attorney

Short sales

Loan Settlement

loan settlements

loan settlement

debt settlement

respa

truth in lending

Forensic Auditing Software

How to become an Auditor

Avoid foreclosure

Litigation against my lender

Mortgage auditing company

Loan auditors

Loan auditing

loan auditing companies

foresic loan auditing companies

loan audit attorneys

best forensic mortgage loan auditing company

bankruptcy modification

Chapter 13

bankruptcy loan modification attorney

servicer audit

mortgage compliance audit

 mortgage document review
temporary restraining order used in foreclosure

motion for injunctive relief mortgage securitization common law torte used in foreclosure defense sample respa non-compliance letter cle credits cle credits on real estate law cle for mortgage law


 Loan Settlement and Foreclosure Defense Blog 
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, 07 June 2009

DISCLAIMER:  THE FOLLOWING IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS A LEGAL REMEDY OR DOES IT SERVE AS LEGAL ADVISE.  PLEASE SEEK AN ATTORNEY WHO CAN PROVIDE PROPER DUE DILIGENCE.

FORMAL STATUTORY

DEMAND TO DISMISS FORECLOSURE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, CLEAR

TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY, REFUND MONIES PAID, AND FOR PAYMENT

OF ATTORNEYS?f FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO FLA.STAT. SEC. 57.105

Dear (Plaintiff Attorney):

This letter is being provided to you, the Law Offices of _________________., and your client ____________________________ Bank, N.A. (Plaintiff in the Action identified herein) as formal notice, pursuant to the matters herein and Fla.Stat. sec. 57.105, of this Firm?fs client Defendant demand that you immediately and forthwith dismiss, with prejudice, that certain civil action styled ________________________ Bank, N.A. v. Defendant et al., 16th Judicial Circuit Court Case No. _____________________________ (CITY NAME, Florida, hereafter referred to as the ?gAction?h); to provide clear title to the real property the subject of the Action; for refund of all monies paid by Defendant incident to the alleged ?gloan?h the subject of the Action; and for payment of attorneys?f fees and costs which are awardable under various Federal and state statutes violated by your filing of the Action. This letter is also being sent as formal notice of Defendant?fs Motion for Sanctions (copy attached hereto) which will be filed and set for hearing unless, pursuant to Fla.Stat. sec. 57.105(4), within twenty-one (21) days of today, Defendant?fs demands as set forth herein are not complied with in writing confirmed by fax receipt, by this Firm, of the _____________, 2008 57.105 demand and notice to _________________, Esq. re: ________________ Bank, N.A. v. Defendant et al.,

necessary documents to legally effect the demands made herein. The facts supporting this demand and the attached Motion are as follows, which are admissions by you, as an agent of the Law Offices of _________________ P.A., in the Complaint which you filed:

(a) On or about August 22, 2007, you, as an agent and attorney of the Law Offices of _____________________., caused a civil action for foreclosure and to ?genforce loan documents?h to be filed in the 16th Judicial Circuit in and for Monroe County, Florida, which has been assigned case number 2007-CA-1120-K;

(b) In paragraph ?g5.?h of Count I of the Complaint, you affirmatively represent to the Court that ?gThe Plaintiff owns and holds the Note and Mortgage?h;

(c) In paragraph ?g4?? of Count I, you affirmatively represent to the Court that the mortgage was ?gsubsequently?h assigned to the Plaintiff ?gby virtue of an assignment to be recorded?h (that being some time in the future);

(d) In paragraph ?g20?? of Count II, you affirmatively represent to the Court that ?gThe Plaintiff is not presently in possession of the Note and Mortgage?h and ?gthe Plaintiff cannot reasonably obtain possession of the Note and Mortgage because THEIR whereabouts cannot be determined (original emphasis):

(e) In paragraph ?g22?? of Count II, you affirmatively represent to the Court that ?gThe Plaintiff will agree to the entry of a Final Judgment of Foreclosure wherein it will be required to indemnify and hold harmless the Defendant(s) [sic] Defendant, from any loss they [sic] may occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the lost Note and Mortgage.?h;

(f) The Action thus inconsistently but affirmatively alleges, in Count I, that ?gPlaintiff owns and holds the Note and Mortgage?h when in fact the admissions in Count II demonstrate, by the allegations of paragraphs ?g20?? and ?g22?? of the Complaint, that the Plaintiff DOES NOT and CANNOT legally establish possession or ownership of the Note or the Mortgage and that same is/are in the possession of an unknown party or parties;

(g) A copy of the Note is not even attached to the Complaint (only an alleged ?gledger of loan?h);

(h) By virtue of the admissions of the Plaintiff in paragraphs ?g20??, ?g21??, and ?g22?? of the Complaint, the Plaintiff has actual knowledge that it never, at any time material, had possession of either the mortgage or the note as same were sold, assigned, or transferred as part of the single-transaction securitization process which resulted in the subject mortgage and/or note being sold as

July 2, 2008 57.105 demand and notice to _________________, Esq. re: ____________ Bank, N.A. v. Defendant et al.,

parceled obligations and becoming part of one or more tranches within a special investment vehicle;

(i) that the Plaintiff cannot establish that the subject note or mortgage is owned or controlled by the Plaintiff ?gindenture trustee?h for unnamed holders of a series of asset-backed bonds (a copy of which are not even attached to the Complaint);

(j) As a direct and proximate result of the transaction referred to in paragraph ?gh?h above, the Plaintiff does not and cannot establish legal standing to even institute a foreclosure action;

(k) As such, the allegation by the Plaintiff in paragraph ?g5?? of the Complaint constitutes matters which are completely devoid of factual or legal support and are thus ?gfrivilous?h within the meaning of Fla.Stat. sec. 57.105;

(l) As the primary and threshold issue of legal standing to institute the Action cannot be satisfied (which was known to you, the Law Offices of ___________________ and the Plaintiff at the time that the Action was instituted), the Action is a patently frivilous claim within the meaning of Fla.Stat. sec 57.105 and the filing and prosecution thereof constitutes a fraud upon the Court.

Your client and your Firm are thus charged with actual notice of the filing of an frivilous claim, as you, your client, and the Law Offices of _________________________, knew or should have known that the Action was both not supported by the material (and record) facts necessary to establish the claim for foreclosure and would not (and could not) be supported by the application of then-existing law to the material (and record) facts.

As such, this Firm has been directed to file and set for hearing, after the expiration of twenty-one (21) days from today (that being _______________, _______, 2008), the attached Motion for Sanctions and to seek attorneys?f fees from both your client and your Firm if the demands set forth herein for immediate dismissal of the Action with Prejudice, providing of clear title to the property the subject of the action, refund of all monies paid by Defendant in connection with the original ?gloan?h the subject of the Action, and payment of all attorneys?f fees and costs associated with this demand are not complied with in writing by the close of business (5:00 p.m.) Wednesday, July 23, 2008.

Sincerely,

_______________________, Esq.

____/_____

attachment (enclosed with mailed original)

copy to: Defendant (w/attachment)

POSTED BY: shawn AT 02:34 am   |  Permalink   |  E-mail this
Bookmark and Share
forensic lender audit mortgage fraud loan auditor forensic loan lender auditor mortgage predatory loan modification short sale company stop foreclosure loss mitigation help mortgage modification modify my mortgage loan auditing document review. The Nation's #1 Provider of the Most Accurate and Comprehensive Loan Audit!

Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This website may only be used pursuant to the service agreement executed with U.S. Lender Audit.  Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of U.S. Lender Audit, LLC.

Not Legal Advice

The information presented on this Web site is not to be construed as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure that this information is up-to-date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area. This information is not intended as legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. It should not be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel.

Copyright © 2008. U.S. Lender Audit, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Mortgage fraud

Mortgage violation check

Mortgage violations

Mortgage audit

mortgage modification

modify my mortgage

Fraud in my mortgage

Audit my mortgage

Mortgage document review

Truth in lending

Predatory loan check

Forensic loan auditor

Auditing my loan

Forensic loan analysis

Loan audit

Forensic loan audit

forensic loan audit

Lender audit

Audit my servicer

Respa violations

Loan modification

Loan modification review

Obtaining loan modification

Tila violations

Stopping foreclosure

Stop foreclosure

Foreclosure attorneys in florida

Florida bankruptcy law

Florida foreclosure law

Predatory lending

Predatory loan

Forensic Loan Software

Forensic Loan Auditing Company

Mortgage Fraud Investigators

Mortgage Audit Company

Attorney for loan modification

structured settlement

expert witness for mortgage litigation

expert testimony

holder in due course

forensic audit used in court

foreclosure case law

truth in lending laws

truth in lending statutes

respa laws

respa statutes

motion for summary judgement

motion to dismiss

tro temporary restraining order

motion for injunctive relief

mortgage securitization

lost note affidavit

sample respa demand letter

sample respa non-compliance letter

formal complaint

cle credits

cle credits on real estate law

cle credits for mortgage law

common law torte used in foreclosure defense

Loan modification attorney

Short sales

Loan Settlement

loan settlements

loan settlement

debt settlement

respa

truth in lending

Forensic Auditing Software

How to become an Auditor

Avoid foreclosure

Litigation against my lender

Mortgage auditing company

Loan auditors

Loan auditing

loan auditing companies

foresic loan auditing companies

loan audit attorneys

best forensic mortgage loan auditing company

bankruptcy modification

Chapter 13

bankruptcy loan modification attorney

servicer audit

mortgage compliance audit

mortgage document review

 

Disclaimer   Privacy Policy

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

best lender audit mortgage fraud loan auditor forensic loan audit mortgage loan auditor mortgage predatory loan loan modification short sale company  stop foreclosure loss mitigation help fraud audit sue my lender short sales stopping forclosure audit my mortgage audit my loan litigation against my lender countrywide loan scams lender class action suit mortgage fraud lender audit mortgage compliance tampa boca raton orlando miami ft myers gainseville boyton beach jacksonville lithia california loan settlement spring hill wesley chapel fl florida fla ca san jose sonoma san francisco walnut creek los angeles loan auditors foreclosure bankruptcy truth in lending law lawyer lawyers attonrneys attorney law firm help expert predatory loan violations analysis mortgage modification modify my mortgage audit my loan mortgage document review loan auditing companies foresic loan auditing companies loan audit attorneys structured settlement expert witness for mortgage litigationexpert testimony foreclosure case law respa statutes truth in lending laws motion to dismiss holder in due course forensic audit used in court truth in lending statutes respa laws motion for summary judgement lost note affidavit formal complaint sample respa demand letter
tro temporary restraining order motion for injunctive relief mortgage securitization mmon law torte used in foreclosure defense sample respa non-compliance letter cle credits cle credits on real estate law cle for mortgage law continuing legal education forensic audit